Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務。從 2021 年 4 月 20 日 (美國東岸時間) 起,Yahoo 知識+ 網站將轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

?
Lv 6
? 發問於 政治及管治公民參與 · 6 年前

有樣野我好唔明. 郭炳江

係大富豪, D錢多到 2,3 世也洗唔完. 點解要賄賂許仕仁, 最終導致鋃鐺入獄.

係為了更多更多的錢嗎?

3 個解答

評分
  • Gary
    Lv 7
    6 年前
    最愛解答

    It has nothing to do with the money at all.

    It is about being in control.

    Money is a very powerful tool. But still it has its limit. For example, when a wealthy has a big house and he/she wants to make it even bigger, the Government can disallow the expansion. In this case, the money is worthless to that wealthy.

    Since that wealthy is powerless but rich, the easiest way is to use the money to influence the public policies. This is not illegal per se in many countries (as instead of gifting the money into the pocket of the politicians, the wealthy "supports" the politicians' political actions, such as donations for his/her elections/re-elections).

    The situation in Hong Kong is different. In Hong Kong, the Administration, not the Legislatures, determines public policies. In this case, rather than having a member of the legislature in his/her disposal, it will be best to have a Government official instead.

  • 6 年前

    個問題可以有2個睇法.

    第一就係根本唔知會比人告,因為商業社會運作方式,係冇可能係100%完全唔犯法下經營,譬如地產商傾下投地單野,多少都會交流下意見,咁可能算係圍標架喎,又譬如好似你過年比封利事個看更,咁又可能係拉得架喎.

    所以有時真係估唔到咁都拉,因為就係約定俗成,法律擺左出黎,但從來唔會咁告.

    第二就係,既然係約定俗成,又何以突然要拉?情況就似大劉係澳門單野,要拉,就用最嚴格既睇法去做你,冇得解.

    但我絕對唔會認為係同錢有關,如果佢係用呢種思維方式去得到財富,唔會去到呢個級數.

  • 6 年前

    佢當然唔係為自己,佢係為佢家族生意可以長存千秋萬袋﹗

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。