promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted
匿名
匿名 發問於 政治及管治法律及道德 · 5 年前

有關盜竊罪。。。急。真係好驚

是咁的。

兩星期前因貪心在某商店盜竊了價值17XX的東西 但並非自用或賺錢。

只是想送比人。

係當場捉住之後報警而我亦認罪過程十分合作。

已經落左口供同打指毛依家保釋當中。

之前並沒有犯案今次初犯而且我極之後悔每日都訓唔到教情緒好低落。

好擔心唔知幾時上庭 因下個月有事情務必去日本一趙 我能出境嗎?

若果我出境日子是上庭日子點算好? 因我已買機票

另外我上網睇左好多新聞及例子

有人會罰款及留案底,但亦有人會自簽守行為 係咪等官判?

我可唔可以上庭自己求請定搵律師 ?但我真係無錢請律師 聽聞法援都好貴

我有無機會自簽守行為而不留案底?

因我是今界某尊科畢業生依家等緊發牌,若有案底我就會無牌失去專業資格屋企供我既一切都沒了,諗起我就不停喊了,有無可能可以令官判我守行為,我真心好後悔。

最後求情信會有用嗎?

感謝回答我問題....極之感激!!!!!

更新:

我見有位GARY既網友成日幫助大家...希望今次可以幫幫我...萬分感激!!!

更新 2:

因我見好多案例

例如已成年少男女承認偷野亦落唒口供打哂指毛,但最後法官都係判簽守行為。

如果跟據GARY你所講我簽守行為機會好小,咁我想請教喱D案例係咩情況或因素下發生?

thank you so much

2 個解答

評分
  • Gary
    Lv 7
    5 年前
    最愛解答

    Thanks for asking for me.

    1. If your bail condition restricts you from leaving Hong Kong, the police will need you to surrender your travel document, as well as periodical reporting. If none of these happens to you, you are free from leaving Hong Kong.

    However, it is best to make the police aware your potential travel plan to avoid any potential issues.

    2. Unless you can ask the court to postpone the schedule. You must appear as ordered.

    3. In your case, a criminal record will be a must with a fine. Binding over will not be possible.

    4. You can. However, given the minor nature of the crime, there is not much you can do.

    You may have a little chance for a better outcome if you have your own lawyer.

    5. Slim to none. To be honest, your confession to the police almost concludes the case. There is no motivation for the Government to give you a chance for binding over when the Government has a sure-win case.

    This is why having a lawyer will increase your chance for binding over (although not much) as this indicates your intention to fight the charge.

    6. It won't hurt, but not much help in your case due to its minor nature.

    2015-05-08 03:15:43 補充:

    I am not sure what kind of case law you mentioned.

    However, I found one for you:

    http://www.stheadline.com/inews-content.php?cat=a&...

    2015-05-08 03:21:20 補充:

    Keep in mind - Binding over is a discretion. There is no set guideline or case law governing when it should be offered..

    But based on research, it is only offered when it is clearly a waste of resource to prosecute the case. For example, the amount in question is very small (like less than $100).

    2015-05-08 03:26:16 補充:

    If I can make this simple for you - Why should the misgistrate or prosecutor consider this option? You present no basis to support binding over is the best solution for your case.

    This is why I said you need a lawyer, so that you can be offered a better deal.

    • Commenter avatar登入以回覆解答
  • 5 年前

    點判都係有罪,對你冇分別。

    • Commenter avatar登入以回覆解答
還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。