匿名
匿名 發問於 本地商業機構香港灣仔區 · 6 年前

法律上的問題求助

因之前有疏忽民事索償事件,約了今日做調解,但在調解中有好多疑問,刚開始調解員帶本人和本人代表律師及保險公司职員和保險公司代表師到一間方房裡面,紹介過後叫本人講返事件的經過,之後就將雙方分開一邊一間房,後來對方給了一個方案 對方的方案是:"你不要告了,我們比一筆撫恤金你當完了些事如何"就此了了結此事,因為事件真的拖了太久了".我是接受此方案的,因為我也想快些完結,不要再為些事煩腦.但本人代表律師說不合法.本人及律師準備走了,打算法庭見的.

後來對方要求只同我代表律師見面再談,說不用我在場,刚開始也不覺有什么問題,但後來我的律師有很大變化,之前對方提出的方案他不接受,說不合法.

對方律師又給了另一個方案,說給你一筆錢,但不再負責你們的律師,本人律師又說不行,那我也沒有辦法,因為法律上的事我不懂,只能聽律師的,然后對方繼續提出第三個方案,我的代表律師就言行上就有了變化,感覺他是對方的律師,所說的對都是有暗示一些事情,令我去接受了一個不合理的方案,因為當時律師的變化另我不知所措.

回來後越想越不對勁.本人才是原告人,為什么不能在場,這樣合法嗎?

好煩,不知怎么辦,求有法律知識的人解答.唔該!

更新:

是否簽了調解協議書就不能反悔了?

1 個解答

評分
  • Gary
    Lv 7
    6 年前
    最愛解答

    1. There is no such thing as legal or illegal in your case.

    a. It is wrong that the Defendant approach you for a settlement without communicating with your lawyer.

    b. It is your own right to settle the case. Unless you have designated, you have the absolute authority for settlement. Your lawyer can only represent you to communicate with the Defendant and advise you regarding the settlement.

    c. There is nothing wrong if lawyers from both sides discuss settlement without your presence. In fact, many works are done without your presence.

    d. Your discussion with your lawyer is confidential (attorney-client privilege). Other communications (like settlement discussion with other lawyers) are not.

    You pay for the legal fee. So you have the right to ask your lawyer why the sudden change. A lawyer working against his/her client is a serious misconduct. So you should talk to your lawyer before jumping conclusion.

    2. Yes.

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。