Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務。從 2021 年 4 月 20 日 (美國東岸時間) 起,Yahoo 知識+ 網站將轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

匿名
匿名 發問於 社會及文化語言 · 8 年前

有關business law的問題 20分

situation:

Derek started a new business venture last year and asked his friend Sally to lend him $50,500. Sally, being a good friend, lent him the money. He promised to pay back within 6 months. After a year Sally has still not been paid. Sally asked Derek to pay back the money but he refused and avoids Sally by all means.

She now prepares to sue Derek to recover the money but Sally dislikes the lawyers and wants to save potential cost in case she fails.

Q1.Which court/tribunal can Sally proceed her case? Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the respective options available to Sally and advise Sally her best choice. Explain your answer.

Q2.Sally considers to proceed the case by reporting to the police. Is there any difference in terms of standard of proof in the court?

2 個解答

評分
  • 匿名
    8 年前
    最愛解答

    1. Small claims court.

    2. Did you write the following document at the time you lent money to that person? Certificate of Indebtedness (signed by both parties). It is even better if it is notarized. Without this piece of important document, it's tough to take this to court or file a police incident report.

    2013-09-07 04:05:48 補充:

    Details can be found in the following link:

    http://www.judiciary.gov.hk/en/crt_services/pphlt/...

  • 8 年前

    Q1:-Money tribunal---small sum of money better.

    Q2:-Police likely to be trusted in standard vs. dislike the lawyers.

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。