Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務。從 2021 年 4 月 20 日 (美國東岸時間) 起,Yahoo 知識+ 網站將轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

匿名
匿名 發問於 政治及管治法律及道德 · 8 年前

被冤枉販毒,求法律人士進,超急急急!!!! 20點

求求大家花少少時間睇睇,真係好冤枉,幫幫忙,萬分萬分感激!!!!!

背景:

受害人- 男 20歲(下稱a) 白底,無犯過事,

預謀者- 男 3x歲(下稱b) 暫無詳細資料,

供應毒品者- 男 (下稱c) 資料不詳

事件(***為重點):

a陪b去c既位置拎1200克k仔 (a事前係唔知道,b只係叫a陪佢)

到達後,c將毒品交比a同b,

*** 此時,b叫a幫佢拎住先,a不以為以拎左..

*** b從無掂過個袋

佢地走左之後,系街,無啦啦有一大班差人衝出黎拉佢地,

***又在此時,差人居然話:[你兩個自己傾掂數]....

一個入世已深既b當然費盡唇舌,叫a代罪,

a當時因為唔知道事件既嚴重性,又一次被b利用,對差人認罪...

(當時差人不停引導a,話認罪可扣3分之1刑期,而行為良好

又可再扣3分1(大約都係坐4年半),但同佢講如果唔認罪既輸左起碼坐10年)

a因為系好驚既情況下而認罪,寧願無辜都坐4年半好過坐10年....

因為家庭壯況,無錢搵大律師,但問左一個普通律師既法律意見如下:

佢話呢d叫做"斷正",斷正無得打,而且話因為b從無掂過個袋..

叫a認罪會比較有著數,叫法緩律師求情,

***因為依家岩岩有條新法例係未滿22歲會比22歲人士判刑較輕,

如果唔係輸左既話,可能個法官會判得仲重......

以上係佢既意見,

作為a既親人,原本我地以為佢唔係冤枉既時候,

我地只會覺得a應該為自己做過既事負責任!!

但當我地知道佢係冤枉,

而且佢因為驚輸而要被屈坐4年半果一刻,我地真係真係好心痛....

我地唔明點解b可以咩事都無....可以逍遙法外....

我一唸起如果被人冤枉既係我自己,我寧願死.....

如果唔認罪,個法緩律師會唔會幫我地?

同埋請問法官會唔會唸下以下既考慮因素???

考慮因素:

1) 會唔會唸 點解a原本話認,依家又話唔認..信任度降低?

2) 會唔會唸 如果用正常邏輯都會知係一個3x歲呃個20歲,

3) 會唔會唸 a係白底,無做過呢d,亦無犯過事,個毒販點會敢將十幾萬貨比佢?

我地依家好辛苦,又唔知個律師講d野岩唔岩,

a又話要認罪算,唔聽我地講申請法緩....

有無人理解倒我地做親人依家有幾痛苦?

麻煩大家就果位律師既意見發表,

同埋講一講我地依家可以點做,真心真心感激你地!!!!!!

1 個解答

評分
  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 年前
    最愛解答

    If your legal aids application is approved, regardless of your decision, the lawyer is obligated to assist you.

    (Of course - some lawyers do not like to do this and that. So you can switch to another lawyer. And this makes the lawyer has the right to refuse the case as well.)

    In answering your questions:

    1. It depends. But definitely, the sentencing reduction due to pleading guilty will be effectively eliminated.

    Usually, the only way to get that off (without penalty) is to attack the credibility of the testimony.

    2. Court is not a place for you to talk logic. Evidence speaks.

    3. New in the market, perhaps?

    My suggestion, regardless pleading guilty or not, is to seek legal aids if eligible. Drug trafficking (due to the amount of drug in questions, there is no way that the Department of Justice will do drug possession) can carry life imprisonment as maximum sentence. So the case will be transferred to District Court at least for trial. Having a lawyer will definitely help even the lawyer is not competent.

    Without knowing the testimony of b and c (as those are the testimonies against a), it is difficult to tell how bad the case is (but believe me - it is bad enough). So I will say, regardless, someone should review all the evidence and testimony before doing anything stupid. Beside - it is well within a right of a suspect (without penalty).

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。