trista 發問於 文學及人文學歷史 · 1 十年前

有關廣島原爆&雅爾達協定的問題 20點!!

在網上睇到有關廣島原爆,"雅爾達協定"等資料

有以下的問題

1. 掟原子彈落廣島的其中一個原因係8/8/1945蘇聯對日宣戰,,而美國想向蘇聯施以下馬威

但係在"雅爾達協定"美國係希望蘇聯對日宣戰,,咁咪有矛盾,,可唔可以解釋下??

在下唔知有冇get錯野..請指點..

資料來源 : http://www.chiculture.net/0124/html/c33/0124c33.ht...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/special/trinity/s...

2. 你地覺得有冇需要掟第2粒原子彈落長崎..可自由作答

thanks~!!

3 個解答

評分
  • 1 十年前
    最愛解答

    圖片參考:http://imgcld.yimg.com/8/n/HA00782940/o/7010040801...

    In principle, U.S. should drop the atomic bombs on Japan even the second bombs. In my point of view, U.S. overseen the overall military environment in WWII, she needs to grasp this chance to show off her military ability & tried to resist the ambition of Soviet Union at the moment . Anyhow, the fateful decision to use nuclear weapons on Japan was controversial even at the time, & the explanations for & motives behind that decision remain a subject of controversy 2 generations after the fact.

    Now let us begin with the salient facts that are beyond dispute:

    Initially, the sole motivation behind the American effort to build a nuclear weapon (the “Manhattan Project” ) was the fear that Germany’s nuclear expertise would be utilized by Hitler to build an atomic bomb for Germany. Had they managed to do so, they could have used it to destroy Britain & Soviet Union, & eventually threaten the U.S. itself. (In fact, German atomic bomb research never came close to success, but this did not become clear until after the war was over).

    By contrast, everyone understood that Japan, with its much weaker scientific & industrial base, represented no conceivable nuclear threat.

    By the time the Manhattan Project was near to producing a prototype atomic bomb in late 1944, a year of unexpected victories by Red Army on eastern front had sapped the ability of the Wehrmacht to resist Allied advances in the West. As the winter went by, it began to seem increasingly likely that Germany would be defeated before the atomic bomb was ready for use. In fact, the final collapse of Nazi Germany occurred two months before the first atomic bomb prototype was tested at Alamogordo.

    For this reason, a number of atomic scientists & even a few governmental officials began to question the wisdom of proceeding with the bomb project, & many more began to question the need to use it to defeat the remaining Axis power, Japan. Many held these views quite vehemently......(To be cont. on sup./com. field)

    圖片參考:http://imgcld.yimg.com/8/n/HA00782940/o/7010040801...

    2010-04-17 10:05:07 補充:

    .......After the German surrender, a group of scientists led by Leo Szilard and Josef Rotblat quit the project altogether, and many more signed petitions to the President that it never be used.

    2010-04-17 10:05:24 補充:

    ~ There remained only two possible strategic uses for the atomic bomb: to hasten the defeat of Japan, and – by demonstrating American willingness to use it – dissuade Stalin from exploiting the growing power and success of the Red Army to dominate post –Nazi Europe.

    2010-04-17 10:05:41 補充:

    Since the 1960’s there was been an ongoing debate among historians as to which was the “real” motivation behind President Truman’s decision to use it on Japan.

    2010-04-17 15:33:29 補充:

    Aftermath, the cold war were started which were caused and created by the Soviets to escalate the areas even lasted the Cold War as well as worsen the mutual relationship between US during that period. Obviously, the Soviets's aim that still had ambitions to gain overseas empires after the WWII.

    資料來源: Nuclear education+me
  • 1 十年前

    不如你問日本人當年有冇需要有入侵中國,我覺得你對歷史問題咁有興趣点解唔去揾有関書籍,別人不會一字一句詳細分析給你,歷史不是左和右咁簡單,係有它因果.

    同時不要睇单一資訊,尋求多方面資訊

  • 1 十年前

    你可以參考以下網址

    http://www.comingzoo.com/

    http://www.pf23.com/

    我自己都去開, 希望可以幫到你~ ^T^

    比我20分!

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。