是否cancel visa student有新希望????

雪梨: 六千外國學生被自動吊銷簽證判無效

一名中國女學生的上訴案揭發,可能有6000多名外國學生被吊銷學生簽證在法律上是無效的。

移民部正在研究聯邦法庭本月初的判決,對被吊銷了簽證的留學生有何影響。移民部並且會採取步驟識別出所有受影響的外國學生,包括仍在澳洲的學生。

此案關鍵是校方通知違反簽證條件的成績不及格或出席率不足學生,限28日內帶同有相片的身份證明文件往見移民官解釋,否則自動吊銷簽證的一段法律條文,遺漏了在2000年海外學生教育服務法例第20段內,「8202」的條款應該適用於法例第20段(1)分段。

案中的上訴人莫芝敏(ZHI MIN MO,譯音)在2005年8月獲發學生簽證,同年10月抵澳,2005年11月12日獲再批學生簽證,有效期至2008年8月21日。莫在臥龍崗大學修讀商學學士課程,但成績未獲校方滿意,在2007年12月5日,被臥大拒絕修讀任何課程一年。校方在2008年2月11日向莫發出見移民官通知,但對方沒有去見,於是簽證被自動吊銷。莫女在2008年3月27日向移民部長申請,撤回自動吊銷簽證,移民官決定不予撤回後,莫女在2008年5月9日向移民上訴審裁處申請覆核移民官決定。審裁處在同年11月5日維持移民官決定後,莫女向聯邦裁判司署上訴,後者在2009年3月5日擱置審裁處的判決,發還給審裁處重新考慮,但審裁處在同年4月仍然判維持移民官決定,莫女再向聯邦裁判司署申請司法覆核,但被拒絕,於是向聯邦法院上訴。

聯邦法院合議庭本月二日有判決,判發給莫女及另一名外國學生HOSSAIN的通知是「無效」的,因為在有關的時期內,沒有指明簽證條件,法庭只是對法例的字眼作出技術上的裁決,故此法例仍然有效。

移民部評估後認為這項判決影響2007年7月1日至2009年12月16日之間發出的通知,共有14789份,其中約6000份導致自動吊銷學生簽證。移民部仍要評估他們之中有多少已離開澳洲。

由於移民部已修改有關規例,並且追溯到2009年12月17日起生效,故此合議庭判決提出的問題已不再存在。

i also have been cancelled my visa by immigration in 1st May 2009, because my pass rate below 50%, so my uni reoprt to immigration, and excluded my course. then i changed to other uni,and i got a new COE and new visa. i did not report to immigration within 28 days.so my visa has been cancelled automatically. and i did not know my visa had been cancelled until i leave Aus. When i went back to HK, the immigration staff told me my visa has been cancelled.

i re-applied the student visa in HK embassy, i recieved the letter from embassy , they refuse my application. the reason is i failed the course requirement and breach the condition 8202.

recently, i heard a news from Australia, it reported that the students like me can get back the visa between June07- dec 09......

i have a question , is it possible i can get back my visa?waiting anyone reply

3 個解答

評分
  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 十年前
    最愛解答

    First, i cannot tell you if you would be getting your Visa back, this involve a lot of court decision and a long battle with Australian Legal System, and as free advice, i cannot tell you this, otherwise MARA and Australian Government will be on my back.

    But i can tell you why how the above case is done, then you can compare her situation with yours, and see if you can have a chance or not.

    The merit of her case is this

    -Nobody, beside DIAC, can revoke your Visa.

    Basically, She studied in Australia, with a bad academic result, and her school Plan to have her visa cancel due to the poor performance, so they refer her to a Immigration panel hearing.

    The things it does wrong for DIAC is, she never attent the interview, and DIAC does not laid down a deadline for her to attent the interview (usually to consider a visa being revoke,you need to interview the person)

    DIAC did not do that, instead the school cancel her visa as she has not reach an immigration decision to DIAC. WHich is illegal, as she was not given the equal chance to speak for her case and the school cancelled her visa.

    The lack of DIAC involvement is the key to this case. And the Automatic Process is the key for her case to have won.

    Now, in your case. IF you can proof that your case is automatically decided without DIAC valid involvement, then you will also have merit on your case, but to decide that, you may need to speak to an Immigration Laywer

    資料來源: My wife is an former DIAC CAse officer and an Immigration Lawyer.
  • TH
    Lv 6
    1 十年前

    Ifu stay at HK,it will be less choice to get back ur visa . IMMI department still will ban u for 3 to 5 yrs in Aus . u can employ Aus IMMI lawyer to help ur case

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。